I’ll admit when I’m wrong. The Madonna half time show wad much better than I expected. That being said. If you gave the acts I highlighted earlier the same stage and effects it would have been great as well.
So there you go.
Sigh
http://www.goodmorninggloucester.com
Spread The GMG Love By Sharing With These Buttons:
Related
Published by Joey Ciaramitaro
The creator of goodmorninggloucester.org Lover of all things Gloucester and Cape Ann. GMG where we bring you the very best our town has to offer because we love to share all the great news and believe that by promoting others in our community everyone wins.
View all posts by Joey Ciaramitaro
Good Morning Gloucester 
You beat me to it. I was going to write a comment telling you I thought the half time show was was pretty good, no matter how old Madonna is. It wasn’t perfect, but we’ve seen much worse. Thanks for ‘manning’ up. 🙂
LikeLike
She was great… too bad the Pats were not..
LikeLike
it was a great spectacle , the movement of the stages and the light show and the cast of thousands . Madonna is in that business ,so are the promoters of the superbowl . it has nothing to do with artistic talent .
LikeLike
You’re such a good egg.
LikeLike
Still think guitar hero Prince’s 2007 Halftime Show was the most rewarding in terms of spectacle vs content. http://www.veoh.com/watch/v389304XGYhx25k?h1=%28Purple+Rain%29Superbowl+Halftime+Performance+-+Prince
LikeLike
aaaahhh now thats music to my ears! She rocked and I hope i look like her when i’m 53! 🙂
LikeLike
I thought she was great!!
LikeLike